Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8996
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBach, Vanessa-
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Annekatrin-
dc.contributor.authorGörmer, Marcel-
dc.contributor.authorFinkbeiner, Matthias-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T16:28:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-11T16:28:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/10005-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8996-
dc.description.abstractThe main goal of the European product environmental footprint (PEF) method is to increase comparability of environmental impacts of products within certain product categories by decreasing flexibility and therefore achieving reproducibility of results. Comparability is supposed to be further increased by developing product category specific rules (PEFCRs). The aim of this paper is to evaluate if the main goal of the PEF method has been achieved. This is done by a comprehensive analysis of the PEF guide, the current PEFCR guide, the developed PEFCRs, as well as the insights gained from participating in the pilot phase. The analysis reveals that the PEF method as well as its implementation in PEFCRs are not able to guarantee fair comparability due to shortcomings related to the (1) definition of product performance; (2) definition of the product category; (3) definition and determination of the representative product; (4) modeling of electricity; (5) requirements for the use of secondary data; (6) circular footprint formula; (7) life cycle impact assessment methods; and (8) approach to prioritize impact categories. For some of these shortcomings, recommendations for improvement are provided. This paper demonstrates that the PEF method has to be further improved to guarantee fair comparability.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUBA, 3712 95 337, Environmental Footprint of Products and Servicesen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subject.ddc333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaftde
dc.subject.otherproduct environmental footprinten
dc.subject.otherPEFen
dc.subject.otherpilot phaseen
dc.subject.otherLCAen
dc.subject.otherISO 14044en
dc.subject.otherISO 14040en
dc.subject.othercomparabilityen
dc.subject.othercomparative assertionsen
dc.titleProduct Environmental Footprint (PEF) Pilot Phase—Comparability over Flexibility?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.date.updated2019-08-01T03:16:58Z-
tub.accessrights.dnbfreeen
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinen
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.3390/su10082898en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleSustainabilityen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceBaselen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume10en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameMDPIen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue8en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber2898en
Appears in Collections:FG Technischer Umweltschutz / Sustainable Engineering » Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sustainability-10-02898-v2.pdf1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons