Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10856
For citation please use:
Main Title: Movement‐mediated community assembly and coexistence
Author(s): Schlägel, Ulrike E.
Grimm, Volker
Blaum, Niels
Colangeli, Pierluigi
Dammhahn, Melanie
Eccard, Jana A.
Hausmann, Sebastian L.
Herde, Antje
Hofer, Heribert
Joshi, Jasmin
Kramer‐Schadt, Stephanie
Litwin, Magdalena
Lozada‐Gobilard, Sissi D.
Müller, Marina E. H.
Müller, Thomas
Nathan, Ran
Petermann, Jana S.
Pirhofer‐Walzl, Karin
Radchuk, Viktoriia
Rillig, Matthias C.
Roeleke, Manuel
Schäfer, Merlin
Scherer, Cédric
Schiro, Gabriele
Scholz, Carolin
Teckentrup, Lisa
Tiedemann, Ralph
Ullmann, Wiebke
Voigt, Christian C.
Weithoff, Guntram
Jeltsch, Florian
Type: Article
Language Code: en
Abstract: Organismal movement is ubiquitous and facilitates important ecological mechanisms that drive community and metacommunity composition and hence biodiversity. In most existing ecological theories and models in biodiversity research, movement is represented simplistically, ignoring the behavioural basis of movement and consequently the variation in behaviour at species and individual levels. However, as human endeavours modify climate and land use, the behavioural processes of organisms in response to these changes, including movement, become critical to understanding the resulting biodiversity loss. Here, we draw together research from different subdisciplines in ecology to understand the impact of individual‐level movement processes on community‐level patterns in species composition and coexistence. We join the movement ecology framework with the key concepts from metacommunity theory, community assembly and modern coexistence theory using the idea of micro–macro links, where various aspects of emergent movement behaviour scale up to local and regional patterns in species mobility and mobile‐link‐generated patterns in abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. These in turn influence both individual movement and, at ecological timescales, mechanisms such as dispersal limitation, environmental filtering, and niche partitioning. We conclude by highlighting challenges to and promising future avenues for data generation, data analysis and complementary modelling approaches and provide a brief outlook on how a new behaviour‐based view on movement becomes important in understanding the responses of communities under ongoing environmental change.
URI: https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/11974
http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10856
Issue Date: 20-Apr-2020
Date Available: 16-Nov-2020
DDC Class: 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Subject(s): biodiversity
animal movement
dispersal
migration
nomadism
mobile links
metacommunity
species coexistence
biotic filter
environmental filter
Sponsor/Funder: DFG, 263283606, GRK 2118: Verknüpfung von Biodiversitätsforschung und Bewegungsökologie in dynamischen Agrarlandschaften (BioMove)
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal Title: Biological Reviews
Publisher: Wiley
Publisher Place: New York, NY
Volume: 95
Issue: 4
Publisher DOI: 10.1111/brv.12600
Page Start: 1073
Page End: 1096
EISSN: 1469-185X
ISSN: 0006-3231
Appears in Collections:FG Planungsbezogene Tierökologie » Publications

Files in This Item:
BRV_BRV12600.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF | Size: 570.12 kB
DownloadShow Preview
Thumbnail

Item Export Bar

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons