Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10953
For citation please use:
Main Title: Is the Blade Element Momentum theory overestimating wind turbine loads? – An aeroelastic comparison between OpenFAST's AeroDyn and QBlade's Lifting-Line Free Vortex Wake method
Author(s): Perez-Becker, Sebastian
Papi, Francesco
Saverin, Joseph
Marten, David
Bianchini, Alessandro
Paschereit, Christian Oliver
Type: Article
Language Code: en
Abstract: Load calculations play a key role in determining the design loads of different wind turbine components. To obtain the aerodynamic loads for these calculations, the industry relies heavily on the Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory. BEM methods use several engineering correction models to capture the aerodynamic phenomena present in Design Load Cases (DLCs) with turbulent wind. Because of this, BEM methods can overestimate aerodynamic loads under challenging conditions when compared to higher-order aerodynamic methods – such as the Lifting-Line Free Vortex Wake (LLFVW) method – leading to unnecessarily high design loads and component costs. In this paper, we give a quantitative answer to the question of load overestimation of a particular BEM implementation by comparing the results of aeroelastic load calculations done with the BEM-based OpenFAST code and the QBlade code, which uses a particular implementation of the LLFVW method. We compare extreme and fatigue load predictions from both codes using sixty-six 10 min load simulations of the Danish Technical University (DTU) 10 MW Reference Wind Turbine according to the IEC 61400-1 power production DLC group. Results from both codes show differences in fatigue and extreme load estimations for the considered sensors of the turbine. LLFVW simulations predict 9 % lower lifetime damage equivalent loads (DELs) for the out-of-plane blade root and the tower base fore–aft bending moments compared to BEM simulations. The results also show that lifetime DELs for the yaw-bearing tilt and yaw moments are 3 % and 4 % lower when calculated with the LLFVW code. An ultimate state analysis shows that extreme loads of the blade root out-of-plane bending moment predicted by the LLFVW simulations are 3 % lower than the moments predicted by BEM simulations. For the maximum tower base fore–aft bending moment, the LLFVW simulations predict an increase of 2 %. Further analysis reveals that there are two main contributors to these load differences. The first is the different way both codes treat the effect of the nonuniform wind field on the local blade aerodynamics. The second is the higher average aerodynamic torque in the LLFVW simulations. It influences the transition between operating modes of the controller and changes the aeroelastic behavior of the turbine, thus affecting the loads.
URI: https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/12079
http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10953
Issue Date: 15-Jun-2020
Date Available: 30-Nov-2020
DDC Class: 600 Technik, Technologie
Subject(s): load calculations
wind turbines
Blade Element Momentum
Sponsor/Funder: TU Berlin, Open-Access-Mittel – 2020
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal Title: Wind Energy Science
Publisher: Copernicus
Publisher Place: Göttingen
Volume: 5
Issue: 2
Publisher DOI: 10.5194/wes-5-721-2020
Page Start: 721
Page End: 743
EISSN: 2366-7451
ISSN: 2366-7443
Appears in Collections:FG Experimentelle Strömungsmechanik » Publications

Files in This Item:

Item Export Bar

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons