Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10979
For citation please use:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorSadovitch, Vitalij-
dc.contributor.authorManzey, Dietrich-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-04T09:24:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-04T09:24:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-06-
dc.identifier.issn2472-1840-
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/12104-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10979-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The experiments investigated the “old issue” of the attitude indicator’s moving-horizon versus moving-aircraft format with current primary flight display technology. Of interest was whether the effects found in earlier studies, favoring the moving-aircraft format, could be replicated with most recent technology including extended horizon displays, which depict the artificial horizon extended over the whole screen with overlaying speed and altitude scales (e.g., B787). Background: Although the moving-horizon format represents the standard approach in Western aviation, human factors research from the 1950s to the 1970s with round electromechanical instruments favored the moving-aircraft format with respect to better support of flight-path tracking and unusual attitude recoveries. However, recent studies using laboratory displays more similar to modern primary flight displays provided inconsistent results. This led to the assumption that the display’s design is a moderating factor of those effects. Method: Thirty-two novices and 13 pilots flew several tracking and recovery tasks in a PC-based simulator equipped with moving-horizon and moving-aircraft formats in classic and extended horizon design. Results: The data show that the previous effects favoring a moving-aircraft format of displaying bank information can be replicated with current primary flight display designs. However, the extended horizon design seems to reduce this effect, at least for pilots. Conclusion: The results suggest reconsidering the format of the attitude indicator at least for new applications, such as control of remotely piloted aircraft.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede
dc.subject.otherdisplay-controlen
dc.subject.otherdisplay design principlesen
dc.subject.otherspatial disorientationen
dc.subject.otherattitude indicatoren
dc.subject.otherstimulus-response compatibilityen
dc.titleAttitude indicator design in primary flight display: Revisiting an old issue with current technologyen
dc.typeArticleen
tub.accessrights.dnbfreeen
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinen
dc.identifier.eissn2472-1832-
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1080/24721840.2018.1486714en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleThe International Journal of Aerospace Psychologyen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplacePhiladelphia, PAen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume28en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend61en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart46en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameTaylor & Francisen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue1-2en
Appears in Collections:FG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologie » Publications

Files in This Item:
Müller_etal_Attitude_2018.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF | Size: 997.04 kB
DownloadShow Preview
Thumbnail

Item Export Bar

Items in DepositOnce are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.