Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-11034
For citation please use:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKisse, Jolando M.-
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorLetzgus, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorKneiske, Tanja M.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T14:27:20Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-09T14:27:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/12160-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-11034-
dc.description.abstractNext to building insulation, heat pumps driven by electrical compressors (eHPs) or by gas engines (geHPs) can be used to reduce primary energy demand for heating. They come with different investment requirements, operating costs and emissions caused. In addition, they affect both the power and gas grids, which necessitates the assessment of both infrastructures regarding grid expansion planning. To calculate costs and CO2 emissions, 2000 electrical load profiles and 180 different heat demand profiles for single-family homes were simulated and heat pump models were applied. In a case study for a neighborhood energy model, the load profiles were assigned to buildings in an example town using public data on locations, building age and energetic refurbishment variants. In addition, the town’s gas distribution network and low voltage grid were modeled. Power and gas flows were simulated and costs for required grid extensions were calculated for 11% and 16% heat pump penetration. It was found that eHPs have the highest energy costs but will also have the lowest CO2 emissions by 2030 and 2050. For the investigated case, power grid investments of 11,800 euros/year are relatively low compared to gas grid connection costs of 70,400 euros/year. If eHPs and geHPs are combined, a slight reduction of overall costs is possible, but emissions would rise strongly compared to the all-electric case.en
dc.description.sponsorshipBMWi, 03ET4020C, Verbundvorhaben: Analyse von Strukturoptionen zur Integration erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland und Europa unter Berücksichtigung der Versorgungssicherheit, Teilvorhaben: Analyse der Verteilnetzebene (INTEEVER-AVN)en
dc.description.sponsorshipBMWi, 03ET4069C, Verbundvorhaben INTEEVER-II: Analyse der Integration erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland und Europa unter Berücksichtigung der Versorgungssicherheit und dezentraler Flexibilitätenen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subject.ddc620 Ingenieurwissenschaften und zugeordnete Tätigkeitende
dc.subject.otherheat pumpsen
dc.subject.otherpower griden
dc.subject.othergas distributionen
dc.subject.othergrid expansion planningen
dc.subject.otherload-profilesen
dc.titleA GIS-Based Planning Approach for Urban Power and Natural Gas Distribution Grids with Different Heat Pump Scenariosen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.date.updated2020-09-02T17:21:36Z-
tub.accessrights.dnbfreeen
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinen
dc.identifier.eissn1996-1073-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.3390/en13164052en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleEnergiesen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceBaselen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume13en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameMDPIen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue16en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber4052en
Appears in Collections:FG Energiesysteme » Publications

Files in This Item:
energies-13-04052.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF | Size: 2.98 MB
DownloadShow Preview
Thumbnail

Item Export Bar

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons