Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-15020
For citation please use:
Main Title: 2 °C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall?
Author(s): von Stechow, Christoph
Minx, Jan C
Riahi, Keywan
Jewell, Jessica
McCollum, David L
Callaghan, Max W
Bertram, Christoph
Luderer, Gunnar
Baiocchi, Giovanni
Type: Article
URI: https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/16245
http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-15020
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Abstract: The adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the new international climate treaty could put 2015 into the history books as a defining year for setting human development on a more sustainable pathway. The global climate policy and SDG agendas are highly interconnected: the way that the climate problem is addressed strongly affects the prospects of meeting numerous other SDGs and vice versa. Drawing on existing scenario results from a recent energy-economy-climate model inter-comparison project, this letter analyses these synergies and (risk) trade-offs of alternative 2 °C pathways across indicators relevant for energy-related SDGs and sustainable energy objectives. We find that limiting the availability of key mitigation technologies yields some co-benefits and decreases risks specific to these technologies but greatly increases many others. Fewer synergies and substantial trade-offs across SDGs are locked into the system for weak short-term climate policies that are broadly in line with current Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), particularly when combined with constraints on technologies. Lowering energy demand growth is key to managing these trade-offs and creating synergies across multiple energy-related SD dimensions. We argue that SD considerations are central for choosing socially acceptable 2 °C pathways: the prospects of meeting other SDGs need not dwindle and can even be enhanced for some goals if appropriate climate policy choices are made. Progress on the climate policy and SDG agendas should therefore be tracked within a unified framework.
Subject(s): climate change mitigation
climate policy
co-benefits
risk management
energy efficiency
sustainable development
mitigation risks
Issue Date: 16-Mar-2016
Date Available: 2-Feb-2022
Language Code: en
DDC Class: 330 Wirtschaft
Sponsor/Funder: EC/FP7/265139/EU/Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Pathways and Evaluation of the Robustness of Mitigation Cost Estimates/AMPERE
EC/H2020/642147/EU/Linking Climate and Development Policies - Leveraging International Networks and Knowledge Sharing/CD-LINKS
Journal Title: Environmental Research Letters
Publisher: IOP
Volume: 11
Issue: 3
Article Number: 034022
Publisher DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022
EISSN: 1748-9326
ISSN: 1748-9318
TU Affiliation(s): Fak. 6 Planen Bauen Umwelt » Inst. Landschaftsarchitektur und Umweltplanung » FG Ökonomie des Klimawandels
Appears in Collections:Technische Universität Berlin » Publications

Files in This Item:
erl_11_3_034022.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF | Size: 1.97 MB
DownloadShow Preview
Thumbnail

Item Export Bar

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons