Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Main Title: The costs of benefit sharing
Subtitle: historical and institutional analysis of shared water development in the Ferghana Valley, the Syr Darya Basin
Author(s): Soliev, Ilkhom
Wegerich, Kai
Kazbekov, Jusipbek
Type: Article
Language Code: en
Is Part Of:
Abstract: Ongoing discussions on water-energy-food nexus generally lack a historical perspective and more rigorous institutional analysis. Scrutinizing a relatively mature benefit sharing approach in the context of transboundary water management, the study shows how such analysis can be implemented to facilitate understanding in an environment of high institutional and resource complexity. Similar to system perspective within nexus, benefit sharing is viewed as a positive sum approach capable of facilitating cooperation among riparian parties by shifting the focus from the quantities of water to benefits derivable from its use and allocation. While shared benefits from use and allocation are logical corollary of the most fundamental principles of international water law, there are still many controversies as to the conditions under which benefit sharing could serve best as an approach. Recently, the approach has been receiving wider attention in the literature and is increasingly applied in various basins to enhance negotiations. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the costs associated with benefit sharing, particularly in the long run. The study provides a number of concerns that have been likely overlooked in the literature and examines the approach in the case of the Ferghana Valley shared by Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan utilizing data for the period from 1917 to 2013. Institutional analysis traces back the origins of property rights of the transboundary infrastructure, shows cooperative activities and fierce negotiations on various governance levels. The research discusses implications of the findings for the nexus debate and unveils at least four types of costs associated with benefit sharing: (1) Costs related to equity of sharing (horizontal and vertical); (2) Costs to the environment; (3) Transaction costs and risks of losing water control; and (4) Costs as a result of likely misuse of issue linkages.
Issue Date: 2015
Date Available: 24-Apr-2017
DDC Class: 333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaft
Subject(s): transboundary water cooperation
water governance
issue linkage
Central Asia
Journal Title: Water
Publisher: MDPI
Publisher Place: Basel
Volume: 7
Issue: 6
Publisher DOI: 10.3390/w7062728
Page Start: 2728
Page End: 2752
ISSN: 2073-4441
Appears in Collections:Inst. Landschaftsarchitektur und Umweltplanung » Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2015_soliev_et-al.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons