Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-6385
Main Title: How health technology assessment agencies address the issue of unpublished data
Author(s): Kreis, Julia
Panteli, Dimitra
Busse, Reinhard
Type: Article
Language Code: en
Abstract: Objectives: Reporting bias potentially threatens the validity of results in health technology assessment (HTA) reports. Our study aimed to explore policies and practices of HTA agencies regarding strategies to include previously unpublished data in their assessments, focusing on requests to industry for unpublished data. Methods: We included international HTA agencies with publicly available methods papers as well as HTA reports. From the methods papers and recent reports we extracted information on requests to industry and on searches in trial registries, regulatory authority Web sites and for conference abstracts. Results: Eighteen HTA agencies and seventy-three reports were included. Agencies’ methods papers showed variability regarding requests to industry (requests are routinely carried out in seven cases, not mentioned in six, at the discretion of HTA authors in three, and based on manufacturer applications in two), which were reflected in the reports investigated. As reporting of requests was limited, it often remained unclear whether unpublished data had been received. Searches in trial registries, at regulatory authorities or for conference abstracts are described as a routine or optional part of the search strategy in the methods papers of 9, 11, and 8 included agencies, respectively. A total of 52 percent, 39 percent, and 16 percent of reports described searches in trial registries, at regulatory agencies, and hand searching of conference proceedings. Conclusion: International HTA agencies currently differ considerably in their efforts to address the issue of unpublished data. Requests to industry may constitute one strategy to access and include unpublished data, while agencies can learn from each other concerning successful practice.
URI: https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de//handle/11303/7076
http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-6385
Issue Date: 2014
Date Available: 27-Oct-2017
DDC Class: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Subject(s): technology assessment
biomedical
publication bias
review literature as topic
health policy
Usage rights: Terms of German Copyright Law
Journal Title: International journal of technology assessment in health care
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publisher Place: Cambridge
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Publisher DOI: 10.1017/s026646231300072x
Page Start: 34
Page End: 43
EISSN: 1471-6348
ISSN: 0266-4623
Notes: Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.
Appears in Collections:Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen » Publications

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
how_health_technology.pdf158.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DepositOnce are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.