Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8023
Main Title: Cognitive Rhythms Reluctantly Revisited
Author(s): Kowal, Sabine
O'Connell, Daniel C.
Type: Article
Language Code: en
Abstract: In response to the Power (1983) - Beattie (1984) controversy, a more general critique of the construct of cognitive rhythms is presented. It is argued that the term itself is a misnomer, that the relevance of articulation rate has been neglected, that fluent and hesitant phases of cognitive rhythms have been assessed both subjectively and intuitively, that the speech-production model underlying the concept is simplistic, and that the empirical evidence is based on an extraordinarily small corpus which has been described inadequately in the research literature.
URI: https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de//handle/11303/8894
http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8023
Issue Date: 1985
Date Available: 8-Jan-2019
DDC Class: 400 Sprache
Subject(s): cognitive rhythms
articulation rate
License: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Journal Title: Language and Speech
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Publisher Place: Washington, DC
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
Publisher DOI: 10.1177/002383098502800106
Page Start: 93
Page End: 95
EISSN: 1756-6053
ISSN: 0023-8309
Notes: Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.
Appears in Collections:Inst. Sprache und Kommunikation » Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kowal_et_al_1985.pdf138.46 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DepositOnce are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.