Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8029
Main Title: To Pay or Not to Pay: Competing Theories to Explain Individuals’ Willingness to Pay for Public Environmental Goods
Author(s): Liebe, Ulf
Preisendörfer, Peter
Meyerhoff, Jürgen
Type: Article
Language Code: en
Abstract: Several theories have been proposed in an attempt to explain individuals’ willingness to pay (WTP) for public environmental goods. While most studies only take into account a single theory, this article discusses competing theories. These include, in addition to a basic economic model, the theory of public goods, Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior, and Schwartz’s norm-activation model. Empirical results are based on a contingent valuation study of biodiversity in German forests. Multivariate analyses demonstrate that studies using single theories omit crucial explanatory variables and, hence, might be misleading. Economic models of WTP have proven to be incomplete, that is, they have restricted explanatory power and need to be supplemented by psychological and sociological models. Furthermore, a general finding is that factors influencing WTP are different for “in-principle WTP” on the one hand and “amount of WTP (given in-principle WTP)” on the other. Income, for example, does not affect whether individuals are willing to pay at all, but significantly influences how much they are willing to pay.
URI: https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de//handle/11303/8900
http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8029
Issue Date: 2010
Date Available: 8-Jan-2019
DDC Class: 300 Sozialwissenschaften
150 Psychologie
Subject(s): willingness to pay
contingent valuation
theory of public goods
theory of planned behavior
norm-activation model
License: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Journal Title: Environment and Behavior
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Publisher Place: Washington, DC
Volume: 43
Issue: 1
Publisher DOI: 10.1177/0013916509346229
Page Start: 106
Page End: 130
EISSN: 1552-390X
ISSN: 0013-9165
Notes: Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.
Appears in Collections:FG Landschaftsökonomie » Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liebe_et_al_2010.pdf183.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DepositOnce are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.