Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Main Title: Effects of Trust, Self-Confidence, and Feedback on the Use of Decision Automation
Author(s): Wiczorek, Rebecca
Meyer, Joachim
Type: Article
Language Code: en
Abstract: Operators often fail to rely sufficiently on alarm systems. This results in a joint human-machine (JHM) sensitivity below the one of the alarm system. The ‘confidence vs. trust hypothesis’ assumes the use of the system depends on the weighting of both values. In case of higher confidence, the task is performed manually, if trust is higher, the user relies on the system. Thus, insufficient reliance may be due to operators’ overconfidence in their own abilities and/or insufficient trust in the decision automation, but could be mitigated by providing feedback. That was investigated within a signal detection task, supported by a system with either higher sensitivity (HSS) or lower sensitivity (LSS) than the human, while being provided with feedback or not. We expected disuse of the LSS and insufficiently reliance on the HSS, in the condition without feedback. The feedback was expected to increase reliance on the HSS through an increase in trust and/or decreases in confidence, and thus, improve performance. Hypotheses were partly supported. Confidence in manual performance was similar to trust in the HSS even though humans’ sensitivity was significantly lower than systems’ sensitivity. While confidence had not effect on reliance or JHM sensitivity, trust was found to be positively related with both. We found disuse of the HSS, that could be improved through feedback, increasing also trust and JHM sensitivity. However, contrary to ‘confidence vs. trust’ expectations, participants were also found to make use of the LSS. This misuse could not be reduced by feedback. Results indicate the use of feedback being beneficial for the overall performance (with HSS only). Findings do not support the idea that misuse or disuse of the system may result from comparison of confidence and trust. We suppose it may rather be the product of users’ wrong strategy of function allocation, based on the underlying idea of team work in combination with missing assignment of responsibility. We discuss this alternative explanation.
Issue Date: 12-Mar-2019
Date Available: 11-Apr-2019
DDC Class: 150 Psychologie
Subject(s): decision aid
alarm system
function allocation
Sponsor/Funder: DFG, 414044773, Open Access Publizieren 2019 - 2020 / Technische Universität Berlin
DFG, 244855988, Laborexperimentelle Evaluierung des Einflusses von Zusatzinformationen auf die Nutzung von Assistenzsystemen durch Operateure
Journal Title: Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
Publisher Place: Lausanne
Volume: 10
Article Number: 519
Publisher DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00519
EISSN: 1664-1078
Appears in Collections:FG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologie » Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fpsyg-10-00519.pdf995.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons