Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8785
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiebert, Felix Wilhelm-
dc.contributor.authorOehl, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorBersch, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorPfister, Hans-Rüdiger-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T12:51:50Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-14T12:51:50Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-04-
dc.identifier.issn1369-8478-
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/9752-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8785-
dc.description.abstractIn this study the location of vehicle to vehicle distance thresholds for self-reported subjective risk and comfort was researched. Participants were presented with ascending and descending time headway sequences in a driving simulator. This so called method of limits of ascending and descending stimuli (Gouy, Diels, Reed, Stevens, & Burnett, 2012) was refined to efficiently determine individual thresholds for stable time headways with a granularity of 0.1 seconds. Time headway thresholds were researched for 50, 100, and 150 km/h in a city, rural, and highway setting. Furthermore, thresholds for self-driving (level 0 automation: NHTSA, 2013) were compared with thresholds for the experience of subjective risk and comfort in assisted driving, similar to adaptive cruise control (level 1 automation). Results show that preferred individual time headways vary between subjects. Within subjects however, time headway thresholds do not significantly differ for different speeds. Furthermore we found that there was no significant difference between time headways of self-driving and distance-assisted driving. The relevance of these findings for the development of adaptive cruise control systems, autonomous driving and driver behavior modelling is discussed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede
dc.subject.ddc380 Handel, Kommunikation, Verkehrde
dc.subject.otherheadwayen
dc.subject.othermethod of limitsen
dc.subject.otherdriver behavior modelingen
dc.subject.otherrisken
dc.subject.othercomforten
dc.titleThe exact determination of subjective risk and comfort thresholds in car followingen
dc.typeArticleen
tub.accessrights.dnbfreeen
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinen
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5517-
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.001en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviouren
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceAmsterdamen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume46en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend13en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart1en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameElsevieren
Appears in Collections:FG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologie » Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
siebert_etal_2017.pdf1.33 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons