Braking bad – Ergonomic design and implications for the safe use of shared E-scooters

dc.contributor.authorSiebert, Felix Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorRinghand, Madlen
dc.contributor.authorEnglert, Felix
dc.contributor.authorHoffknecht, Michael
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorRötting, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-19T19:49:57Z
dc.date.available2021-11-19T19:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.description.abstractShared e-scooters are introduced as a new form of mobility around the world. Alongside this rise in micromobility, e-scooter crashes are reported, and e-scooter riders are injured and killed in traffic. Little research has been conducted on the relation between ergonomics and the safe use of e-scooters, and it is unclear whether e-scooter riders know about prevailing e-scooter related regulation and if they adhere to existing regulation in traffic. We conducted a field observation (n = 2972) in combination with a questionnaire survey (n = 156), to investigate the influence of ergonomics on the safe use of shared e-scooters, and to explore riders’ knowledge and self-reported behavior. Riders’ brake readiness, dual use (two riders per vehicle), and helmet use was registered, and specific knowledge about the braking system of e-scooters was assessed, alongside knowledge about road rules and reported past safety related behavior. Results reveal a clear effect of braking system design, with significantly more riders readying the left hand brake, in comparison with the right hand or foot brake (depending on the e-scooter model). This was found regardless of the brake-lever-to-wheel coupling, indicating that the preference for the left hand brake can be detrimental to targeted braking of the front or rear wheel. Only one third of respondents could correctly identify the basic braking system of the shared e-scooter they had last used. In addition, high shares of illegal behavior were reported by riders. Implications of these findings for the safe operation of e-scooters, their ergonomic design, and road safety regulation are discussed.en
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1042
dc.identifier.issn0925-7535
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/13900
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-12674
dc.language.isoen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitde
dc.subject.ddc380 Handel, Kommunikation, Verkehrde
dc.subject.othermicromobilityen
dc.subject.othere-scootersen
dc.subject.othernaturalistic observationen
dc.subject.otherbrake ergonomicsen
dc.titleBraking bad – Ergonomic design and implications for the safe use of shared E-scootersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber105294
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105294
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleSafety Scienceen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameElsevieren
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceAmsterdam [u.a.]en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume140
tub.accessrights.dnbfreeen
tub.affiliationFak. 5 Verkehrs- und Maschinensysteme>Inst. Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaft>FG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologiede
tub.affiliation.facultyFak. 5 Verkehrs- und Maschinensystemede
tub.affiliation.groupFG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologiede
tub.affiliation.instituteInst. Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaftde
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading…
Thumbnail Image
Name:
siebert_etal_2021.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections