Measures of Reliance and Compliance in Aided Visual Scanning

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorWiczorek, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorGünzler, Torsten
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-08T17:45:43Z
dc.date.available2019-01-08T17:45:43Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.descriptionDieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.de
dc.descriptionThis publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.en
dc.description.abstractObjective: We study the dependence or independence of reliance and compliance as two responses to alarms to understand the mechanisms behind these responses. Background: Alarms, alerts, and other binary cues affect user behavior in complex ways. The suggestion has been made that there are two different responses to alerts—compliance (the tendency to perform an action cued by the alert) and reliance (the tendency to refrain from actions as long as no alert is issued). The study tests the degree to which these two responses are indeed independent. Method: An experiment tested the effects of the positive and negative predictive values of the alerts (PPV and NPV) on measures of compliance and reliance based on cutoff settings, response times, and subjective confidence. Results: For cutoff settings and response times, compliance was unaffected by the irrelevant NPV, whereas reliance depended on the irrelevant PPV. For subjective estimates, there were no significant effects of the irrelevant variables. Conclusion: Results suggest that compliance is relatively stable and unaffected by irrelevant information (the NPV), whereas reliance is also affected by the PPV. The results support the notion that reliance and compliance are separate, but related, forms of trust. Application: False alarm rates, which affect PPV, determine both the response to alerts (compliance) and the tendency to limit precautions when no alert is issued (reliance).en
dc.identifier.eissn1547-8181
dc.identifier.issn0018-7208
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/8914
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8043
dc.language.isoen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc300 Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitde
dc.subject.othertrusten
dc.subject.otherwarningsen
dc.subject.otheralertsen
dc.subject.otherrelianceen
dc.subject.othercomplianceen
dc.subject.otherautomationen
dc.subject.othersignal detection theoryen
dc.subject.otherconfidenceen
dc.titleMeasures of Reliance and Compliance in Aided Visual Scanningen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1177/0018720813512865
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Societyen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSAGE Publicationsen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceWashington, DCen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend849
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart840
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume56
tub.accessrights.dnbdomain
tub.affiliationFak. 5 Verkehrs- und Maschinensysteme::Inst. Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaft::FG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologiede
tub.affiliation.facultyFak. 5 Verkehrs- und Maschinensystemede
tub.affiliation.groupFG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologiede
tub.affiliation.instituteInst. Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaftde
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinde

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Meyer_et_al_2013.pdf
Size:
450.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Publications