Attitude indicator format
| dc.contributor.author | Müller, Simon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Roche, Fabienne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Manzey, Dietrich | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-04T13:44:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-12-04T13:44:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-10-15 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract. A simulator study investigated the consequences of a transition between two alternative formats of the attitude indictor in aircraft cockpits, the moving-horizon and moving-aircraft format. Two groups of novices practiced performing two flight tasks (flight-path tracking and recovery from unusual attitudes) with one attitude-indicator format for six practice sessions, before transitioning to the other format. The results show that, after practice, participants were able to perform both tasks equally well with both attitude-indicator formats. However, the number of reversal errors in the recovery task increased considerably when transitioning from the moving-aircraft to moving-horizon format. No such effect emerged for the other direction. This suggests that the former transition is more difficult and represents a possible risk for flight safety. | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2192-0931 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2192-0923 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/12117 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10993 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject.ddc | 150 Psychologie | de |
| dc.subject.other | attitude indicator | en |
| dc.subject.other | transition | en |
| dc.subject.other | spatial disorientation | en |
| dc.subject.other | display design principles | en |
| dc.subject.other | display–control compatibility | en |
| dc.title | Attitude indicator format | en |
| dc.title.subtitle | How difficult is the transition between different reference systems? | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.type.version | acceptedVersion | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi | 10.1027/2192-0923/a000168 | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername | Hogrefe | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplace | Göttingen | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend | 105 | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart | 95 | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume | 9 | en |
| tub.accessrights.dnb | free | en |
| tub.affiliation | Fak. 5 Verkehrs- und Maschinensysteme::Inst. Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaft::FG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologie | de |
| tub.affiliation.faculty | Fak. 5 Verkehrs- und Maschinensysteme | de |
| tub.affiliation.group | FG Arbeits-, Ingenieur- und Organisationspsychologie | de |
| tub.affiliation.institute | Inst. Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaft | de |
| tub.publisher.universityorinstitution | Technische Universität Berlin | en |