Comparison of methods for determining the effectiveness of antibacterial functionalized textiles

dc.contributor.authorHaase, Hajo
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorKeitel, Laura
dc.contributor.authorKeil, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorMahltig, Boris
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-23T12:52:49Z
dc.date.available2017-11-23T12:52:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAntimicrobial functionalization of textiles is important for various applications, such as protection of textile materials from decomposition, generation of more effective wound dressings, and the prevention of infections or malodors resulting from bacterial growth. In order to test the efficacy of new products, their antibacterial activity needs to be evaluated. At present, several different procedures are being used for this purpose, hindering comparisons among different studies. The present paper compares five of these assays using a sample panel of different textiles functionalized with copper (Cu) and silver (Ag) as antibacterial agents, and discusses the suitability of these methods for different analytical requirements. Bacterial viability was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm, a colorimetric assay based on MTT (3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2, 5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) conversion, an agar diffusion assay, and colony formation, either after culturing in media containing textile samples, or after recovery from textiles soaked with bacterial suspension. All experiments were performed with a Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and a Gram-positive (Staphylococcus warneri) model organism. In general, the results yielded by the different methods were of good comparability. To identify the most suitable test system for the particular type of antibacterial coating, several factors need to be taken into account, such as choosing appropriate endpoints for analyzing passive or active antibacterial effects, selection of relevant microorganisms, correcting for potential interference by leaching of colored textile coatings, required hands on time, and the necessary sensitivity.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, 325093850, Open Access Publizieren 2017 - 2018 / Technische Universität Berlinde
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/7162
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-6437
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subject.ddc540 Chemie und zugeordnete Wissenschaftende
dc.subject.otherMTT assayen
dc.subject.otherantibacterialsen
dc.subject.othercoatingsen
dc.subject.othersilveren
dc.subject.otherbacterial disk diffusionen
dc.subject.otherulture mediaen
dc.subject.othercopperen
dc.subject.otherbacterial growthen
dc.titleComparison of methods for determining the effectiveness of antibacterial functionalized textilesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumbere0188304en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0188304
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue11en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitlePlosOneen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernamePLoSen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceLawrence, Kan.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume12en
tub.accessrights.dnbfreeen
tub.affiliationFak. 3 Prozesswissenschaften::Inst. Lebensmitteltechnologie und Lebensmittelchemie::FG Lebensmittelchemie und Toxikologiede
tub.affiliation.facultyFak. 3 Prozesswissenschaftende
tub.affiliation.groupFG Lebensmittelchemie und Toxikologiede
tub.affiliation.instituteInst. Lebensmitteltechnologie und Lebensmittelchemiede
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading…
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017_haase_etal.pdf
Size:
4.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections