The costs of benefit sharing

dc.contributor.authorSoliev, Ilkhom
dc.contributor.authorWegerich, Kai
dc.contributor.authorKazbekov, Jusipbek
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T12:30:53Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T12:30:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractOngoing discussions on water-energy-food nexus generally lack a historical perspective and more rigorous institutional analysis. Scrutinizing a relatively mature benefit sharing approach in the context of transboundary water management, the study shows how such analysis can be implemented to facilitate understanding in an environment of high institutional and resource complexity. Similar to system perspective within nexus, benefit sharing is viewed as a positive sum approach capable of facilitating cooperation among riparian parties by shifting the focus from the quantities of water to benefits derivable from its use and allocation. While shared benefits from use and allocation are logical corollary of the most fundamental principles of international water law, there are still many controversies as to the conditions under which benefit sharing could serve best as an approach. Recently, the approach has been receiving wider attention in the literature and is increasingly applied in various basins to enhance negotiations. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the costs associated with benefit sharing, particularly in the long run. The study provides a number of concerns that have been likely overlooked in the literature and examines the approach in the case of the Ferghana Valley shared by Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan utilizing data for the period from 1917 to 2013. Institutional analysis traces back the origins of property rights of the transboundary infrastructure, shows cooperative activities and fierce negotiations on various governance levels. The research discusses implications of the findings for the nexus debate and unveils at least four types of costs associated with benefit sharing: (1) Costs related to equity of sharing (horizontal and vertical); (2) Costs to the environment; (3) Transaction costs and risks of losing water control; and (4) Costs as a result of likely misuse of issue linkages.en
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/6312
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-5868
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-5583
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subject.ddc333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaftde
dc.subject.othertransboundary water cooperationen
dc.subject.otherequityen
dc.subject.otherenvironmenten
dc.subject.otherwater governanceen
dc.subject.otherissue linkageen
dc.subject.otherinstitutionsen
dc.subject.otherCentral Asiaen
dc.titleThe costs of benefit sharingen
dc.title.subtitlehistorical and institutional analysis of shared water development in the Ferghana Valley, the Syr Darya Basinen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.3390/w7062728en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue6en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleWateren
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameMDPIen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceBaselen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend2752en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart2728en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume7en
tub.accessrights.dnbfreeen
tub.affiliationFak. 6 Planen Bauen Umwelt::Inst. Landschaftsarchitektur und Umweltplanungde
tub.affiliation.facultyFak. 6 Planen Bauen Umweltde
tub.affiliation.instituteInst. Landschaftsarchitektur und Umweltplanungde
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading…
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015_soliev_et-al.pdf
Size:
1.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections