[Book Review:] Francesco Lo Piccolo and Thomas Huw (Eds.): Ethics and planning research surrey, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009

dc.contributor.authorGualini, Enrico
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-08T17:34:50Z
dc.date.available2019-01-08T17:34:50Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.descriptionDieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.de
dc.descriptionThis publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.en
dc.description.abstractHaving approached this volume from a sceptical standpoint on ethics in planning, I have been favourably impressed by the reflections it prompts – although not to the effect of dropping my scepticism altogether. The strength of this volume lies in highlighting the relevance of the topic and the inevitability of taking position with regard to it. While directing attention to a range of ethical implications in planning, the volume focuses on a specific set of ethical issues concerning the role of planning in the production and management of knowledge. The starting point can be summarized as follows: since designing and conducting research involves assuming an explicit or implicit ethical standing towards our social world, planning researchers need to develop reflexivity and awareness – a meta-ethics, so to speak – of the ethical issues and dilemmas involved in their work. Neglecting the need for reflexive sensitivity on ethical issues is neither politically nor epistemologically innocent, and can be seen as contributing to the (re-)production of the very conditions that should challenge our ethical consciousness and our moral conduct as planners.en
dc.identifier.eissn1741-3052
dc.identifier.issn1473-0952
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/8861
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-7990
dc.language.isoen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc300 Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.ddc690 Hausbau, Bauhandwerkde
dc.subject.ddc720 Architekturde
dc.subject.otherbook reviewen
dc.subject.otherplanningen
dc.subject.otherethicsen
dc.subject.otherplanning researchen
dc.title[Book Review:] Francesco Lo Piccolo and Thomas Huw (Eds.): Ethics and planning research surrey, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1177/1473095211432614
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitlePlanning Theoryen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSAGE Publicationsen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceWashington, DCen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend215
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart211
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume12
tub.accessrights.dnbdomain
tub.affiliationFak. 6 Planen Bauen Umwelt::Inst. Stadt- und Regionalplanungde
tub.affiliation.facultyFak. 6 Planen Bauen Umweltde
tub.affiliation.instituteInst. Stadt- und Regionalplanungde
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinde

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading…
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gualini_2013.pdf
Size:
70.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections