Cognitive Rhythms Reluctantly Revisited

dc.contributor.authorKowal, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, Daniel C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-08T17:40:41Z
dc.date.available2019-01-08T17:40:41Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.descriptionDieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.de
dc.descriptionThis publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.en
dc.description.abstractIn response to the Power (1983) - Beattie (1984) controversy, a more general critique of the construct of cognitive rhythms is presented. It is argued that the term itself is a misnomer, that the relevance of articulation rate has been neglected, that fluent and hesitant phases of cognitive rhythms have been assessed both subjectively and intuitively, that the speech-production model underlying the concept is simplistic, and that the empirical evidence is based on an extraordinarily small corpus which has been described inadequately in the research literature.en
dc.identifier.eissn1756-6053
dc.identifier.issn0023-8309
dc.identifier.urihttps://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/8894
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-8023
dc.language.isoen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc400 Sprachede
dc.subject.othercognitive rhythmsen
dc.subject.otherarticulation rateen
dc.titleCognitive Rhythms Reluctantly Revisiteden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi10.1177/002383098502800106
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleLanguage and Speechen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSAGE Publicationsen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceWashington, DCen
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend95
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart93
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume28
tub.accessrights.dnbdomain
tub.affiliationFak. 1 Geistes- und Bildungswissenschaften::Inst. Sprache und Kommunikationde
tub.affiliation.facultyFak. 1 Geistes- und Bildungswissenschaftende
tub.affiliation.instituteInst. Sprache und Kommunikationde
tub.publisher.universityorinstitutionTechnische Universität Berlinde

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading…
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kowal_et_al_1985.pdf
Size:
138.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections