Özen, ArdaAuhl, DietmarVöllmecke, ChristinaKiendl, JosefAbali, Bilen Emek2021-06-302021-06-302021-05-14https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/13335http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-12127Additive manufacturing provides high design flexibility, but its use is restricted by limited mechanical properties compared to conventional production methods. As technology is still emerging, several approaches exist in the literature for quantifying and improving mechanical properties. In this study, we investigate characterizing materials’ response of additive manufactured structures, specifically by fused deposition modeling (FDM). A comparative analysis is achieved for four different tensile test specimens for polymers based on ASTM D3039 and ISO 527-2 standards. Comparison of specimen geometries is studied with the aid of computations based on the Finite Element Method (FEM). Uniaxial tensile tests are carried out, after a careful examination of different slicing approaches for 3D printing. We emphasize the effects of the chosen slicer parameters on the position of failures in the specimens and propose a simple formalism for measuring effective mechanical properties of 3D-printed structures.en600 Technik, Technologieadditive manufacturing3D printingmechanicsslicing approachpolymersfinite element methodOptimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETGArticle2021-06-111996-1944